553 views
<p><a href="https://usa-girls.startentree.nl/">Alpha and Omega are actually very close</a></p> <p><a href="https://usa-girls.brabantmotorverhuur.nl/">A girl goes into casual sex looking for a relationship?</a></p> <p><a href="https://usa-girls.vakantiestartpagina.net/">When boys and girls fight, girls win.</a></p> <p><a href="https://usa-girls.start-casino.nl/">Women&rsquo;s natural role</a></p> <p><a href="https://usa-girls.hetmooistedorp.be/">My depiction of a healthy relationship</a></p> <p><a href="https://usa-girls.jobcenters.nl/">Relationships as a business</a></p> <p><a href="https://usa-girls.sexybegin.be/">Be yourself. Do what matters.</a></p> <p><a href="https://usa-girls.champion.be/">No, women can&rsquo;t live without men</a></p> So, I think that the vast majority of the portion of women that remain hypergamous for life and won’t settle for someone at their level (whatever portion that is, I clearly don’t think it’s all women since we can plainly see many that marry and stay happily married and don’t cheat) probably aren’t consciously thinking, I just want to fuck these higher value guys. I think they really are hoping for commitment. (Now, perhaps the 5% most promiscuous that really just love sex with lots of hot men are self-aware enough to consciously know that they are just going for sex with the best.) The problem is that by definition a woman going for a higher-value man is of lower value to him and so why would he want to commit to her? Not very often will that happen. So I agree with you that, subconsciously, the always-hypergamous portion of women really would prefer things in this order: 1) higher-value male commitment plus sex; 2) higher-value sex. But I think most of them are consciously desiring commitment because that would be their number 1 option and they rarely consciously admit that 2) is a viable plan B. I also think there is a portion of women that are hypergamous for a while but eventually learn and get realistic and take a guy in their league. Finally, in terms of raw economics, a lower-value woman only has easy sex as her “currency” to “buy” a higher-value male’s attention. If he wants commitment he’ll go for one closer to his own value.